Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1150

reference
55-tree-1
name
1150
tree-preservation-order

undefined

55-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.004508 50.886912)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.004451 50.886906,-1.004454 50.886917,-1.004462 50.886927,-1.004474 50.886936,-1.004490 50.886941,-1.004507 50.886943,-1.004525 50.886941,-1.004541 50.886936,-1.004554 50.886928,-1.004562 50.886918,-1.004565 50.886907,-1.004563 50.886896,-1.004555 50.886886,-1.004542 50.886878,-1.004527 50.886873,-1.004509 50.886871,-1.004491 50.886872,-1.004475 50.886877,-1.004463 50.886885,-1.004454 50.886895,-1.004451 50.886906)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL